How I Became a Writer

I can’t avoid the cliché. I’ve always wanted to be a writer. I suppose it comes from a very early habit of daydreaming and overexposure to Disneyworld. My father worked as a scenic artist for the park most of my childhood and would bring home discarded props from rides and murals of seascapes that would sit in our garage. Doing laundry was almost like stepping into a fantasy. I was one of few kids who had a life-sized resin mermaid greet me at the door.  I was the child who always got lost, distracted, fascinated by shiny things. I was the child who spent the afternoons in the woods behind our house making it my own Terabithia. I hoarded library books and got excited about our school’s Scholastic book fairs, rushing the displays for Judy Blume or Willo Davis Roberts. I was hooked on the fantastic. I wanted nothing more than to think up stories like my favorite authors and write them down.

In fourth grade, I wrote my first short story about a boy who takes a girl on an adventure through network television where each show is its own reality. I called it “Channel 7”. My first editing experience came from a book of poetry assigned in fifth grade. My teacher changed one of my lines before the books were sent to be printed. I was devastated, but learned my lesson early: publication often means artistic sacrifice. I was usually the showcase student, my essays and stories in the glass cases of the elementary school lobby. My fellow students bribed me with candy bars and decorative erasers, begging me to write their themes and book reports. I was a shy, skinny limp-haired girl who spent most of her time in her head, dreaming up more stories and clamoring through the dictionary for new cool words to use that no one else knew. Writing was my one thing. I couldn’t cross the monkey bars or win at four-square, but I could write.

            In middle school, I became obsessed with Edgar Allen Poe. One particular collection of his stories and poems was a staple in my book bag, the card in the back filled up with my name because I checked it out from the media center every week. His style thrilled me, the bleak, gothic and often ironic tone eventually having its effect on my own poetry. I attempted to copy him, writing my own solemn lines during class until a teacher caught me and snatched one of my poems. This sparked a visit to the guidance counselor where I was asked how things were at home. I knew I had been successful. I loved the mystery and economy of Poe’s stories, the way he always edged the supernatural. The language was haunting and fluid, and I was smitten by words like phantasmagoric and gossamer.

It wasn’t long before the elements of genre fiction made their way into my writing. I thrived on the sweeping sci-fi and fantasy plots of Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman, Tolkien, Bradbury, H.G. Wells, and James Thurber. My first year of college was a humbling experience, closed in on all sides by excellent writers in my intro classes whose seasoned styles were evident in the first workshop. I entered campus writing contests in hopes of a simple honorable mention. My fiction proved to be sufficient enough to earn two second-place awards in two separate contests, and despite consistent rejection from the literary magazine, my confidence was high. My style, written in a mostly adolescent, diary-entry tone with snarky characters and sharp dialogue, was steadily improving. Myself and many of my classmates were still in what I would come to know as the “wish-fulfillment” stage, where the beginning writer focuses not on the complexities of the human condition but rather the ideal and escapist notion that one should write a story he or she would most like to read.

This is where I fell into the romance genre. My stories from very early on had the markings of romance. Even those written for the contests involved a boy/girl interaction and romantic undertone. I had read the bodice-rippers from time to time and often imagined more lively plots or characters for each once I was finished with them. I would give the female lead more gusto or the setting more flare and eventually came up with my own idea for what I thought would be an easy market to penetrate. I set my first romance novel in the Victorian era where I could play with the language I so loved and escape into a world I was fascinated by. I created characters I could relate to that subverted the stereotypes of the Harlequins and interacted with humor and intelligence rather than perpetually swooning. Someone published it.

Even armed with this new credit, I still felt inferior in the workshops. I envied those students who had mastered the short story with literary prose and complex characters. Though I was devoted to my own lengthy escapist fiction, I longed to write something worthy of my peers and instructors. My short stories were ‘fun’, typically about teenagers and resembled the plot lines of John Hughes movies, worthy only of the fiction section of Seventeen. When it came time to apply to graduate school, I knew I had to come up with something completely new. It was time to put away my “wish-fulfillment” writing, to dive into real life and explore the complexities of human nature. It was time to evolve, to create characters I pitied rather than envied. No more romance, no more happy endings. It was time to be literary.

My writing life became the beautiful struggle to create fine art rather than to please the market with entertainment fiction. I found I could master poetic description but my conflicts were usually formulaic. When I tried to make them otherwise, they became non-existent. And so my own style came to me, gradually at first and honed by the remarks of my classmates. The workshop voices still echo when I write, urging me to be braver, more real. Finally, my stories took on a different shape. My idealistic characters rebelled against me, wanting the flaws of human nature and the conflicts that showcased them. But, the ever-haunting allure of the fantastic wouldn’t be silenced even when it was completely unnecessary for the story. Finally, my own hybrid was born. I found myself using the supernatural to place characters in pivotal moments. The mystical became a quiet, benevolent hand that sneaks in, does its work and vanishes again.

And so I’ve arrived in the middle of both passions: to dive deep into the realm of human complexities and create characters that ring true while also paying tribute to the fantasy and magic that has captured me all my life. My work as a writer finally encompasses all that drives me rather than only what I feel obligated to write. I can now merge the literary with the fantastic, write ‘fun’ stories that also show a character’s deepest failings and trace my personal style and creative process back to grade school. My first creative writing teacher told me that writing style takes years to develop. I thought he was crazy and that I already had a polished approach at nineteen years old. Many years and nearly three diplomas later, at last, I saw what he meant. Over time, I had copied other authors, written for entertainment, written to please the literary community and constructed my creative life from each experience. If I’ve learned anything from this burden that is the drive to write, it’s that a good writer will always be in the process of creative evolution.

Where’s the Love? Finding Prestige for the Romance Genre

The practice of writing romance has recently evolved. A market once dominated by demure, virginal debutantes is now swarming with strong, capable heroines, intricate plot lines and diverse supporting characters. Newer stories are being published that lack the soap-opera feel, introduce edgy themes and express open female sexuality. Many of these established authors are skilled at what they do.

The intellectual community denounces the genre entirely as nothing but a serving of empty calories. This particular market, however, is the most lucrative of them all As a market that has no other goal but to enchant its readers, how does the romance genre make its place among its literary fellows? The love story is a staple of literature be it classic or contemporary. The question of how it is told seems to determine the prestige it is granted by literary society. Romance is instilled in many of the classics brought to the classroom, but shunned when it sits in a specific section in our modern bookstores.

What defines a quality work of fiction from a trashy sex novel? What attributes of a romantic relationship separate one from the other? Some will argue that the explicit sex degrades the value of the characters’ relationships. If so, then why was “Brokeback Mountain” published in the New Yorker, hailed by literary critics and showered with awards when sex is one of its driving elements? What is required of a love story in order to be considered an item of intellectual worth? Many publishers of romance list their guidelines in precise detail. The formula usually calls for strong leading characters and a powerful conflict that keeps them apart.

Most of the publishers’ requirements are in sync with the readers’, and what they are asking for is not so different from what all fiction writers hope to accomplish: to tell a good story. There is a vast community of romance writers who study and discuss the craft, looking for ways to enhance their writing and become a more powerful force for their readers. But, despite the sophisticated prose and complex characters infused in many novels of the genre, the word ‘romance’ carries with it a stigma of hack writing.

Finding a respectable niche for our most widely read genre is important to authors and readers alike, as well as students of fiction. Classic and contemporary works such as Jane EyreWuthering Heights and Girl With a Pearl Earring should be explored for what facets of romance make them successful. A happy ending should not instantly make a story deficient, nor should the intentions of the author influence the question of quality. Escapist and entertainment fiction deserve to be recognized as components of a genre that requires just as much labor and devotion as its colleagues.

What Gift Cards Mean to Me

So, you wake up Christmas morning, tip toe out to the kitchen and click on the coffee machine. Your family starts to materialize, you kick-start some bacon or cut into that slab of ham and gaze at the Christmas tree you silently dread dismantling before its post-New Year’s presence becomes too embarrassing.  The gifts are perched under the bottom-most branches. You still feel that twinge of excitement from childhood, wondering what your family has picked for you, and if they know you well enough to choose wisely. Did you drop enough hints about the Cuisinart?And, the barbaric process begins.

Kids rip Santa patterns and tear off carefully tied ribbon. Boxes come open (after the traditional torture of taped sides) and smiles all around. And yours? A tiny little bag with a spit of tissue and an itty bitty name tag. Something small, certainly; jewelry? Nope, it’s a gift card. Blast. Just because I’m a grown-up doesn’t mean I don’t want an actual present. What a thoughtless, effortless waste of potential Christmas spirit. Or not.

What is this anti-gift card sentiment lately? Gift cards are convenient, require minimal wrapping, give your loved ones freedom from exchanges and returns, and come in all kinds of sparkly designs and brands. So, what can be bad about that? People argue that a gift card requires no thought, that it simply demonstrates that Christmas has become about how lazy we are as gifters. Where are the endless hours of shopping for that one special thing that so-and-so is just going to love?

Where is the time spent meticulously wrapping it with gold-inlay scroll work wreath patterns and curling ribbon with the scissors blade? Well, let me ask this? Is all that crap really necessary? Is proof of love really in the stress-filled torment just described? “But, I enjoy doing that for others,” you say. Sure, but I can count on two hands how many gifts I’ve slaved and brainstormed over that had only mild impressions on those who received them. There’s nothing like that Christmas Day “Oh…how nice,” reaction to morph someone into a Scrooge.  

Many people say a gift card requires no thought. A CG is usually given by someone who doesn’t know you well enough to shop for something that matters. Maybe once upon a time. Guys would get Home Depot cards and chicks would get Victoria’s Secret. Done. But now, there are a gajillion brands, restaurants and stores out there to choose from. Choosing a gift card has truly become a bit of critical thinking. You must consider your loved one’s tastes in an even more refined way than ever before. For women, there are beauty spas, jewelry and clothing outlets, for men are electronic and hardware stores. There are music, movie, ebay, Amazon, book store and department store cards. Anything and everything a friend or family member may want hangs from a colorful inventory of rectangular salvation at pretty much any major store you frequent.

For further proof, ask yourself if it’s possible for someone to get you the wrong gift card. Certainly. A Starbuck’s or Applebee’s GC is a great way to tell me you don’t know squat about me. I hate Starbuck’s and I never go to Applebee’s (unless I need to use up a gift card some jackass gave me). Someone who knows you well and is thinking about your wishes deliberates about which card to invest in. And, my favorite, those people who get you cards for stores or restaurants that they go to. This is an indication that they were already there and plucked a GC for you to kill two birds. So thoughtful. So, proof positive that the choice of gift card does take thought and consideration, because it is possible to miss the mark.

So what if there’s just a tiny bag or card to open? It’s better than the re-gifted fruit cakes or massage/footbath/heated pillow type crap they have complied at Walgreens. Now, you can take your gift card to one of your favorite places and shop for something you’re sure to love. And, the person who gave it to you is at Christmas peace. It works both ways, you see. Do your loved ones a favor and get over yourself. Asking for a gift card is a gift in itself! You have just saved your family and friends a butt load of anxiety. I am always happy with a gift card. Especially now, with so many choices, the gifter is demonstrating his or her knowledge of what you like.

 It may also put a damper on the ‘discounter’, the person who gets BOGOs and freebies, throws them into a gift bag and beams like they’ve spent something. I admit to being guilty of that, but mostly for those sadists who appear at the last minute with a Swiss Colony meat and cheese feast and all you have for them is a glass of punch (the “Let’s-not-buy-each-other-anything-this-year” pact is a cruel, sick joke that sometimes ends friendships).

But, at least you know how much a person is willing to spend on you, rather than getting something dug up from around the house, or that candle holder you gave them three years ago. Yes, we remember. Gift cards force people to not only spend a tangible amount of money, but also exercise their awareness of their friends’ and family’s tastes and preferences.

 So, I say bring it on. Let your pride and sensibilities relax and save the people who love you gobs of time and energy. Sure, it’s nice to open stuff and have your little pile of loot to revel in, but don’t dismiss the gift card. It truly is a revolution in gift-giving, and does take time, consideration and love. Christmas is for kids, after all.

Why Your Professor is a Jerk

So, you are glaring at your professor because he has just scrawled an F on the paper you worked so hard…OK, so you skipped some classes and hashed it out in the middle of the night eight hours before it was due, hoping the classes you did attend would help you BS at least part of it. Right? So, do you have the right to be angry with your educator? I mean, jeez, he’s kind of mean, doesn’t let anyone turn in late work and doesn’t even offer extra credit. What a jerk! Or is he?

There is an abyss of misunderstanding when it comes to teacher/student relationships. Yes, it’s difficult to be a student, especially working part or full time, juggling personal and academic issues while hoping and praying your professor will throw you a bone once in a while. But, it’s often twice as difficult managing 50 to 100 or more students, many of whom believe they are entitled to special privileges and exceptions. No matter how explicit a syllabus is, there are always those who ask to be excused from universal policies.

There are always students who are under the impression that skipping class, bombing assignments and generally crapping all over the course goals is certainly not enough to fail. I’ve had students turn in 0 essays all semester and still show up for the final exam. Seriously?

I teach Composition now, but I remember what it was like to be a student. I had a job, too, but I didn’t blame my instructors for my poor grades. When I screwed up, I knew it and owned it.  I didn’t just expect my professors to let me retake an exam I simply slept through my alarm for.

Few seem to consider that the prof has a life, too. For example, every semester when the syllabi are handed out, a student never fails to approach me and say something like, “Um, yeah, I’m going on a family vacation and I’ll be gone on the day of the midterm. Can I, like, take it early or something?” Sure. Let me take time away from my family, employ my already overworked mother-in-law to come and watch my kids while I spend about 10 dollars driving out to campus (on a day I don’t teach) so that you, special person, can take your midterm early so you can go enjoy your vaca.

My favorite student question:

For a student who was absent – “Did I miss anything?” Nope. I mean, I was actually going to teach class that day but I thought, ‘So-and-so isn’t here, so maybe I’ll have everyone just scratch their butts for an hour’. Yes, you missed A CLASS. Most days, when I get that question, I say ‘yes’ and nothing else.  Sure, I could summarize the lesson plan, give them some textbook pages to read or let them turn in the assignment for that day online. But, why should I? So I can teach class twice?  Once, in the classroom, and again online? Instructors allot grading time and everything else as part of their workday. Now, I have to tell my kids ‘Hold on, mommy’s working’ while I supplement materials online for someone who slept in that day.

So, let me get this straight; you should be able to do missed classwork at your convenience and the expense of mine? Hey, throw me a 20 spot and I’ll send you that summary. Sometimes I think students believe instructors are androids who exist only to offer them second chances and undeserved full credit.

When I was a brand new adjunct (part time) instructor, I would overhear my colleagues griping about students. I imagined they hated their jobs, went home every night to a TV dinner and an empty house. I stereotyped them as lonely hermits who took on teaching college because they needed an ‘easy’ paycheck in their miserable retirement. I considered myself different because I wanted to be an educator most of my adult life. I’m buried in a mountain of student loans because I love interacting with students and the looks on their faces when I prove to them that a good thesis statement is something they can write.

But, I wondered if this was my fate; to curse my students in the break rooms to other instructors, to spend my class time growling and grunting at every raised hand. Although the first is true, the latter has still not happened…yet. It’s not the struggle to understand the material, it’s the accountability. Only a day after I explained the standard format guidelines to one of my classes – you know, 12 point Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins, blah, blah – one of my students emailed me and asked, “Can I do mine in Calibri font?” Um…NO.  WTF? Do I sound bitter? Perhaps it is this gradual fermenting of aggravation that makes those curmudgeon professors so hated. Maybe they, like me, were once enthusiastic, bounding into the classroom with Labrador innocence.

And now, after hundreds of lame excuses and essays that reveal the person was likely texting during that lecture, they are harsh, unforgiving and disenchanted. So, I can say that we were once students, and we understand. But, our students were never teachers, so they can’t possibly relate to our peeves. After all the painstaking power-points and tediously prepared lectures, using all our blood, sweat and tears from years of studying to administer quality material in the classroom, only to hear “What did I miss?” Oh, so much more than you will ever know.